| |||
★ Independent · Editor-Owned · No Paraphrase ★ Burn the Playbook "The newsletter DC reads and hopes you don't." | |||
|
Same courthouse. Same U.S. Attorney. Same judge. Two men who each defied the federal government, one with a sandwich, one with a House subpoena. Guess which one the Justice Department chased to a jury, and which one it tried to scrub from the record.
On August 26, 2026, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, refused, for now, to let Jeanine Pirro's office erase Steve Bannon's contempt-of-Congress conviction. Not because he sided with anyone. Because the government would not tell him why.
That silence is the story. When prosecutors go quiet about their reasons, the reason is usually the defendant's friends.
ADVERTISEMENT
You're Invited: Live Tax-Smart Investing Webinar
Your portfolio could be losing more to taxes than you might realize. On September 17, Range's CFPs and CPAs share the portfolio moves that can help you maximize your after-tax returns — join us live, and bring your questions for Q&A.
This webinar is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Range defines "high earners" as households with income over $300k.
Read the DOJ's own press release yourself, the one that promised the sandwich case the full weight of the law.
The Government Could Not Say Why
February 9, 2026: Pirro personally signed a motion to dismiss Bannon's indictment with prejudice, offering one sentence: dismissal "is in the interests of justice." No career prosecutor's name appears on it, per Washington Examiner, Feb 9, 2026
April 7, 2026: the Supreme Court granted Bannon's petition, vacated the D.C. Circuit ruling that had upheld his conviction, and sent the case back so the dismissal motion could be considered, per JURIST, Apr 7, 2026
August 26, 2026: Judge Nichols denied the motion without prejudice: the government "does not explain its motivations for seeking dismissal" and so fails Rule 48(a), per MeidasTouch, Aug 26, 2026
4 months: the prison term Bannon already served in 2024 after a 2022 jury convicted him on two counts of contempt for defying the January 6 committee, per AP via WSLS, Aug 26, 2026
1 felony count: what Pirro's office filed against Sean Charles Dunn, a DOJ paralegal, four days after he threw a wrapped Subway sandwich at a CBP officer on 14th Street NW on August 10, 2025, per U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., Aug 14, 2025
"Easily north of 241": January 6 defendants convicted of assaulting police officers who received full pardons on January 20, 2025, by Just Security's tally of DOJ's own case data, per Just Security, Jan 22, 2025
Here is what is proven. A jury convicted Bannon in July 2022. Judge Nichols sentenced him. He appealed and lost at the D.C. Circuit. He served his four months. Then the Justice Department that had won the case switched sides and asked the Supreme Court to help it throw away its own victory. Solicitor General John Sauer argued that federal rules let the government drop a case "even after a jury finds the defendant guilty and the district court enters judgment."
That argument is technically true. Rule 48(a) lets prosecutors dismiss. But it says "by leave of court," and the D.C. Circuit has long held that leave requires a reason: a real one, not a slogan. Nichols wrote that the government's one-liner "fails to meet Rule 48(a)'s procedural requirement," and told DOJ to come back and explain whether a decades-old precedent called Thorpe even allows dismissal after a judgment that still stands.
Read that plainly. A Trump-appointed judge looked at a Trump-appointed prosecutor's motion to spare a Trump ally and said: you have not given me a single sentence I can put my name to.
The Sandwich Got the Full Weight of the Law
Now walk across the hall. Same building, same judge. In August 2025, during the federal takeover of D.C. policing, Sean Dunn, a 37-year-old Justice Department paralegal and Air Force veteran, yelled at a Customs and Border Protection officer and threw his sandwich at the man's chest. It landed still in the wrapper. Dunn ran, got caught, and told officers, "I did it. I threw a sandwich."
Pirro's office charged him with a felony: assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer. Her press release promised that anyone who lays a hand on an officer will feel "the full weight of the law." Attorney General Pam Bondi fired him. A D.C. grand jury refused to indict on the felony. Pirro's office refiled it as a misdemeanor and took it to trial anyway.
On November 6, 2025, a jury in Judge Nichols' courtroom acquitted him. Pirro's response was a lecture: "Even children know when they are angry, they are not allowed to throw objects at one another."
So the office had reasons to spare when the defendant was a paralegal with a hoagie. It had one unexplained sentence when the defendant was the president's former chief strategist. That is not prosecutorial discretion. That is a loyalty test with a docket number.
This Is a Pattern, Not a Pair
The Dunn charge rests on the same federal assault law that DOJ used to convict hundreds of January 6 rioters. By Just Security's count of DOJ data, roughly 608 people were charged with assaulting or obstructing officers that day; 172 pleaded guilty to assault and 69 to assault with a deadly or dangerous weapon. On January 20, 2025, Trump pardoned nearly all of them, including David Dempsey, whom Judge Royce Lamberth had sentenced to 20 years for conduct he called "exceptionally egregious."
So the rule in Washington's federal courthouse now reads like this: assault an officer for Trump, get a pardon. Throw a sandwich at an officer during a protest against Trump, get a felony charge and a fired paralegal. Defy a Democratic-led congressional subpoena for Trump, and the department that convicted you will petition the Supreme Court to help unconvict you.
Here is BTP's argument about why. Pirro is not confused about the law. The point of the Bannon motion was never to win — Bannon already served his time. The point is the signal: the record of a Trump loyalist is an insult to be cleaned up, and the record of a Trump critic is a weapon to be built. Prosecutors who learn that lesson stop asking "what did he do?" and start asking "whose is he?"
I spent twenty years inside politics watching people with no connections get the full weight of every rule, and I never once saw a one-sentence motion undo anything for them. Mercy in that building has always had a price, and the people who needed it most could not pay it.
What this means for you is not abstract. Every time a prosecutor's office spends its lawyers on a hoagie trial and its credibility on a Bannon rescue, it is telling every cop, every juror, and every defendant in that city that the law is a menu, and the connected order first. Juries in D.C. have already noticed: two grand juries in two weeks refused Pirro's felonies in August 2025.
Judge Nichols has given the department a chance to do the one thing it has avoided since February: say out loud why Steve Bannon deserves what Sean Dunn did not get.
Forward this to one person who still believes the Justice Department decides cases by what you did, not who you know.
Sources
AP via WSLS: Judge Nichols denies, for now, DOJ's motion to dismiss Bannon's conviction, August 2026. source
MeidasTouch: Text of Nichols' Rule 48(a) ruling, including the Thorpe question, August 2026. source
The New Republic: Nichols rejects DOJ's attempt to save Bannon; April 2026 Supreme Court context, August 2026. source
JURIST: Supreme Court vacates the D.C. Circuit ruling and remands for consideration of DOJ's dismissal motion; Sauer's argument, April 2026. source
Washington Examiner: Pirro signs the February 9 motion to dismiss Bannon's indictment with prejudice, February 2026. source
U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia: Press release charging Sean Charles Dunn with felony assault on a federal officer, with Pirro's quotes, August 2025. source
The Advocate: Grand jury refuses to indict Dunn on the felony; Bondi fires him; second grand jury refusal in two weeks, August 2025. source
Courthouse News Service: Jury before Judge Nichols acquits Dunn of misdemeanor assault; Pirro's "even children know" statement, November 2025. source
Just Security: Statistics on January 6 assault-on-officer convictions covered by the January 20, 2025 pardons; Dempsey and Judge Lamberth, January 2025. source
CBS News: Status of the Letitia James prosecutions after dismissal and two grand jury refusals, with new March 2026 referrals, March 2026. source
Burn Notice: When the same prosecutor, in the same courtroom, cannot explain why one man's conviction should vanish while another man's sandwich deserved a felony, the explanation is the one she will not write down.
ADVERTISEMENT
Unify Your Teams and Tech Stack With HubSpot
Connect your customer data, teams, and tools without the hassle of complex integrations or lengthy setups. One easy platform gives marketing, sales, and service teams a unified customer view and the tools to turn it into growth.
Why HubSpot and what's new
Generate leads and automate marketing with Marketing Hub
Build your pipeline and close more deals with Sales Hub
Scale customer support and drive retention with Service Hub
Keep customer data clean, connected, and actionable with one, unified platform
Join 306,000+ in over 135 countries using HubSpot to grow their businesses.
See what a more connected approach to growth can do for you and your team. Get setup quickly and start checking off your hardest tasks.
— Michael
Free through Election Day. BTP Insider subscribers get the Friday deep read, the monthly receipts digest, podcast Q&A priority, and the quarterly print bundle. The Insider Election Room is free through Election Day. No card. One link. Get in →
DC sports, same receipts. The Uptown Rundown covers the Commanders, Nationals, Capitals, Wizards and Hoyas every day at 4 PM. Subscribe free →